The Social Model of Disability and Its Impact on the Neurodiversity Paradigm
- Janelle Meredith
- Jan 1
- 3 min read
Disability is often seen as a problem within an individual’s body or mind. This view has shaped how society treats people with disabilities, especially those who are neurodivergent. The Social Model of Disability challenges this idea by shifting the focus from the individual’s biology to the environment and society around them. This shift is central to the Neurodiversity Paradigm, which sees neurological differences as natural variations rather than deficits. Understanding this model helps us rethink how we support and include autistic people and others with diverse neurological profiles.

Society Creates Barriers, Not the Individual
The core idea of the Social Model of Disability is simple but powerful: society creates barriers that disable people, not their conditions. For example, stairs do not disable someone who uses a wheelchair; the stairs themselves are the barrier. This analogy helps us understand that disability arises when environments and social systems fail to accommodate different needs.
Applied to neurodiversity, this means that an autistic person is not disabled by their neurology alone. Instead, they face challenges because many environments are too loud, too bright, or too socially rigid. These settings do not fit their natural way of experiencing the world. The Neurodiversity Paradigm views autism as a natural human variation, a valuable way of being rather than a problem to fix.
This perspective encourages society to change. Instead of trying to “fix” autistic people, we should adapt environments and social expectations to be more inclusive. For example:
Schools can offer quiet spaces and flexible schedules.
Workplaces can provide options for remote work or sensory-friendly offices.
Public spaces can reduce overwhelming sensory inputs like bright lights or loud noises.
These changes reduce barriers and allow autistic people to participate fully.
Understanding the Double Empathy Problem
Communication between autistic and neurotypical people often breaks down. The Social Model reframes this issue through the Double Empathy Problem. This concept explains that misunderstandings happen because both groups have different ways of perceiving and interacting with the world.
Instead of seeing autistic social skills as lacking, the Double Empathy Problem shows that neurotypical people also struggle to understand autistic perspectives. It is a two-way street. Both sides experience difficulty in communication because their neurotypes differ.
This means the “barrier” is not a flaw in the autistic person but a mismatch in communication styles. Recognizing this helps reduce stigma and encourages mutual respect. For example:
Neurotypical people can learn about autistic communication preferences.
Autistic people can be supported in expressing themselves in ways that feel comfortable.
Social settings can be designed to allow different communication styles to coexist.
This approach fosters better understanding and connection between diverse neurotypes.
Challenging the Medical Model and Cure Culture
The Social Model stands in contrast to the Medical Model of disability, which focuses on impairments and seeks to “cure” or “fix” individuals. The Medical Model often views autism as a problem to be treated, emphasizing functional challenges and interventions.
Many in the neurodiversity community reject this approach. They argue that focusing on “cure” culture can be harmful because it ignores the value of neurological diversity and the role of societal barriers. Instead, the Social Model calls for:
Recognizing autism as a natural variation.
Addressing ableism, which is discrimination based on disability.
Creating supportive environments rather than trying to change the individual.
This shift promotes acceptance and inclusion rather than exclusion and stigma.
Practical Steps to Apply the Social Model in Everyday Life
Understanding the Social Model is just the first step. Applying it requires concrete actions in various areas:
Education: Schools can implement individualized learning plans that respect sensory and social needs. Teachers can receive training on neurodiversity to better support students.
Workplaces: Employers can offer flexible work hours, quiet workspaces, and clear communication methods. This helps neurodivergent employees thrive.
Healthcare: Medical professionals can adopt a strengths-based approach, focusing on support rather than “fixing” conditions.
Community Spaces: Public venues can reduce sensory overload by controlling noise and lighting and providing quiet zones.
These changes reduce barriers and create a more inclusive society.
The Broader Impact on Society
The Social Model of Disability and the Neurodiversity Paradigm encourage society to rethink what it means to be “normal.” They promote diversity as a strength and call for systems that accommodate all people. This shift benefits not only neurodivergent individuals but everyone by creating more flexible, understanding communities.
By focusing on removing barriers rather than changing individuals, society can become more just and equitable. This approach also challenges ableism and promotes human rights for all.


Comments